- 9/19 MSM not reporting Obama's underhand negotiations with the Iraqi Government; outraged citizens write to Congress
- 9/17 Obama lies about his interference in Iraqi negotiations; henchmen make death threats to journalist that exposed Obama's treachery
- 9/17 Ad exposes Obama's interference in negotiations to slow down bringing troops out of Iraq; BHO put political gain ahead of lives
- 9/17 Outrage over Obama's interference in negotiations with Iraq: tried to slow down troop withdrawls for his political gain
- 9/16 Obama guilty of treason! Team Obama confirms Obama asked the Iraqis to slow down discussions over troop withdrawals until he's President
- 9/15 Iraqi Foreign Minister's bombshell; Obama tried to get Iraqis to delay US troop withdrawals until he was President
- Obama not only opposed victory in Iraq, but also actively worked to undermine it
- Obama Biden continue to denigrate our achievements in Iraq; ignore demoralizing impact on troops; Vietnam flashback
- Obama and Dems can not accept success of our efforts in Iraq; the American public disagrees with Democrat "Party of Defeat"
Yesterday, I deliberately did not use the first word that came to mind when I learned than Obama had asked the Iraqis to delay troop withdrawals until after President Bush left office.
Today having learned that, according to the AP, Team Obama is CONFIRMING that "Obama had told the Iraqis they should not rush through a "Strategic Framework Agreement" governing the future of U.S. troops until after President Bush leaves office," I will not hesitate to say what was on my mind.
I feel betrayed by Barack Hussein Obama. I have long been convinced that an Obama administration would not be in the best interests of this country. Now it has been confirmed beyond all shadow of a doubt.
For Obama's spokesperson to even think that she issued a denial...while confirming the meat of the charges ...reflects the nuanced world in which Obama and his cronies operate. The fact is Obama interfered in a negotiation which he simply was not authorized to do...and in doing so may have broken US law.
To think that this narcissist would delay bringing home our troops so that he could take the personal credit is beyond despicable.
Today, as someone with close family in the war zone I will express my disgust and contempt for this act of TREASON...which was the first word that came to mind when I learned the news.
How ironic that on this very day that Team Obama confirms Obama's treachery, Rich Cohen would also run a headline about the election in his WaPo column which referred to TREASON. Astonishingly the subject of that label was John McCain...a perverse and sickening distortion of the truth by the Obamatron media
Obama statement affirms attempt to delay troop withdrawal
Spokeswoman denies report but ends up confirming its main claim
Posted: September 16, 2008
Source WND
Story also confirmed by AFP
The Obama campaign issued an angry denial to a report yesterday that the Democratic presidential candidate privately urged Iraqi leaders to delay U.S. troop withdrawals, but the statement essentially confirmed the story.
Responding to a column by Iranian-born analyst Amir Taheri in the New York Post, Obama spokeswoman Wendy Morigi insisted Obama "has never urged a delay in negotiations, nor has he urged a delay in immediately beginning a responsible drawdown of our combat brigades."
But in the same statement, Morigi said Obama had told the Iraqis they should not rush through a "Strategic Framework Agreement" governing the future of U.S. troops until after President Bush leaves office, the Associated Press reported.
In his column, Taheri writes that he interviewed Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, who confirmed Obama met with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad to urge a delay in the withdrawal of American forces.
"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the U.S. elections and the formation of a new administration," Zebari reportedly said.
Taheri states Obama insisted it was in Iraq's best interest to avoid an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."
That private position would be a stark contrast to Obama's public record.
"The best way to protect our security and to pressure Iraq's leaders to resolve their civil war is to immediately begin to remove our combat troops," Obama said last year at a university in Iowa. "Not in six months or one year – now."
In January of last year, Obama offered legislation on the floor of the Senate called the Iraq War De-escalation Act of 2007, which called for troop withdrawals to begin in May 2007 and to conclude by March 2008.
And in his New York Times editorial released the same month the senator toured the Middle East, Obama wrote, "The call by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki for a timetable for the removal of American troops from Iraq presents an enormous opportunity. We should seize this moment to begin the phased redeployment of combat troops that I have long advocated."
Taheri reported that Iraqi President Jalal Talabani's advisers wonder if Obama is privately working to delay troop withdrawal until after the election in order to claim credit – should Obama win the presidency – for ending the war.
"Indeed, say Talabani's advisers," reports Taheri, "a President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his intervention transformed failure into success."

2 comments:
Assumption #1: Obama broke US laws. Wrong. Assumption #2: Obama did it solely for the sake of self aggrandizement. Wrong. If the Bush/Cheney bandwagon pushes through a structured bill of withdrawal, it will be LOCKED in place when Obama takes office. We can go into plenty of theories as to who may make money on that, and who will get screwed over. Please consider the potential problems with that.
Obama actually asked to leave our troops in a war zone so that he could get credit for the withdrawal. He should "withdraw" his head from his ass. Just wait until his denials offend the Iraqi government.
Post a Comment